Today's hottest deals

Peladn HA-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPeladn HA-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-3
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 18:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
83% 158 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 862
86% 703 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 14
Parallax 24.3
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 19.6
14% 15.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Peladn 512GB M.2-NVMe 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1243 684 702 707 705 493 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
212% Outstanding
Read 2,065
Write 1,549
Mixed 1,260
SusWrite 756
314% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 33.3
153% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 618
530% 779 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 212%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 16G 3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 55 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHL091D PHL 221B8L
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback