Lenovo 82NK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82NK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 15:22
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS Creator Edition
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 248
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 533
59% 463 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
Legend(17AA 3AAB) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.47
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 38.3
33% 34.8 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 32
26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,344
Write 2,138
Mixed 1,733
461% 2,072 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 59.1
194% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 539
397% 528 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 28.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 90 14" 1280 720 LEN8A98
Typical 82NK Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82NK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback