Lenovo 82RM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82RM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 23:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 47.3
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 174
57% 106 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 731
69% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 24.6
10% 16.2 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 21.4
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 1063 1056 1098 1086 977 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 1,122
Mixed 1,149
SusWrite 1,059
265% 1,178 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 61.6
205% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 594
443% 592 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 210%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A1G16RC-062E:B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 88 56 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN9022
Typical 82RM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82RM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback