HP Compaq Elite 8200 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8200 Microtower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '24 at 16:59
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$188 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 167 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 434 45% 364 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 63.6 Reflection 63.1 Parallax 86.1 52% 70.9 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 73.1 Splatting 47 49% 61.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 456 Write 386 Mixed 176 75% 339 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 31 102% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 226 184% 262 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 469 Write 438 Mixed 420 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 38.5 126% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 296 223% 299 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 426GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 79 Write 87.5 Mixed 64.8 58% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
CHIPSBNK USB 2.0 1GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 6025, CHIPSBNK Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 16.9 Write 9.5 Mixed 10.2 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 40% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 4x8GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	24.1"	1920 1200	ENC1946 SX2461W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8200 Microtower Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: HP Compaq Elite 8200 Microtower

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $190Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	1x

RAM
99U5471-020.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 947 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $508

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16