Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500XV
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 13:42
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 61.1
1-Core 197
2-Core 380
108% 213 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,106
109% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,699
105% 1,699 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 3258) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 117
Parallax 93.9
84% 105 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 73.2
73% 92.8 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$320
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,742
Write 2,571
Mixed 2,332
500% 2,215 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 77.2
257% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 411
DQ Mixed 956
653% 820 MB/s
Poor: 315% Great: 616%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
182GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 379
Mixed 255
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 23.5
80% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 130
106% 150 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 51.3
MC Mixed 42.6
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 35.2
SC Write 58.4
SC Mixed 45.4
132% 46.3 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 84.6" 2194 1163 SAM723F SAMSUNG
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback