Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 07:33
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 499
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 84.7
45% 67.1 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 45.4
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
42GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 202 214 263 264 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 359
Write 326
Mixed 323
SusWrite 237
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 36.7
119% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 226
171% 231 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 140 72 77 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 348
Write 164
Mixed 184
SusWrite 108
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 20
75% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 98.5
81% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 76%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB
242GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 97 81 77 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 91.3
Mixed 72
SusWrite 83.3
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 95 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 81.9
Write 97.6
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 95.9
116% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 64%
WD Elements 2667 5TB
25GB free, PID 2667
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 50 49 44 33 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 60.8
Write 60.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 46.2
71% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 120 23" 1280 720 GSM5787 W2363D
Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback