Lenovo 82S9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 19:54
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 44.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 292
83% 163 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 647
67% 541 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AF6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 12.7
0% 9.83 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 15
Splatting 14
9% 9.77 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512GZL 512GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 19 145 210 108 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1496
Write 1047
Mixed 61
SusWrite 92.4
147% 674 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 34.6
156% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 55.9
84% 171 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 122%
Great: 278%
Nvme P0221 Phison 512GB
168GB free
Firmware: 21020102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1046 155 71 73 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 1,403
Mixed 987
SusWrite 249
212% 943 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 59.3
216% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 595
448% 614 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 155%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43BB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 0P 5R 6G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 24% 104 214 57 120 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9059
Typical 82S9 Builds (Compare 1,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback