Asus PRIME Z490-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-P  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 16:41
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K
, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 294
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 924
90% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
175% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 227
Parallax 253
204% 243 fps
MRender 285
Gravity 215
Splatting 158
173% 220 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 175%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 647 303 483 657 620 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,016
Write 1,907
Mixed 1,938
SusWrite 595
310% 1364 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 72.1
238% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 1,093
819% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 200%
Great: 472%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 153 150 148 145 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 464
Mixed 413
SusWrite 184
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 54.7
182% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 349
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
170GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1635 348 219 261 292 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,530
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,673
SusWrite 506
331% 1,466 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 77.2
255% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1129
852% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 223%
Great: 295%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
68GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 105 89 79 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 431
Write 128
Mixed 191
SusWrite 94.4
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 35.5
129% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.1
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 95.8
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.2
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 10% 69 216 58 165 34.1" 1280 720 HPN3728 HP X34
History: Score 31: 0P 5R 2G 0B | Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B
Typical PRIME Z490-P Builds (Compare 10,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-P - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback