Xenta 1291222

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemXenta 1291222  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H510M-K
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 11:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$240
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 289
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,082
99% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,846
114% 1,846 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
MSI(1462 8121) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 101
Parallax 68
63% 82.1 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 60.3
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 470 381 371 372 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 470
Mixed 387
SusWrite 405
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 38.6
135% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 336
252% 335 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kllisre 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G3-
Typical 1291222 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Xenta 1291222

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback