Acer Predator PH18-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 283%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive475% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH18-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQS_RTX
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 05:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 210
2-Core 423
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 825
8-Core 1594
143% 1,209 Pts
64-Core 3,226
200% 3,226 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 166E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4600 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 394
Parallax 293
237% 326 fps
MRender 384
Gravity 231
Splatting 182
207% 265 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 202%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3870 4065 2212 1262 1264 1279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 4,055
Write 4,185
Mixed 2,713
SusWrite 2,325
745% 3,320 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 103
340% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,637
DQ Write 1,301
DQ Mixed 1,440
1,085% 1,459 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 475%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 69.2
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 55.5
164% 57.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 25.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 147%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 240 24.5" 1920 1080 DELA1B3 Dell AW2521H
Typical Predator PH18-71 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PH18-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback