Lenovo 21K9000VUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 21K9000VUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21K9000VUS
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 22:53
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 50.6
1-Core 177
2-Core 316
93% 181 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 922
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 740M
Legend(17AA 50DA) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.20.40.01
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 29.1
17% 23.9 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 48.9
27% 30.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X162N 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1962
Write 1,216
Mixed 1,481
344% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 71.9
235% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 750
505% 623 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 24.9
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback