Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 months ago, 2 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '24 at 20:09
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 172 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 638 67% 534 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.7% Good	Lighting 82.6 Reflection 90.8 Parallax 78 67% 83.8 fps	MRender 96.4 Gravity 77.1 Splatting 70.7 65% 81.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1133 953 901 860 797 740 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 1,544 Write 1,665 Mixed 1,060 SusWrite 897 290% 1,291 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 59.1 190% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 763 DQ Write 570 DQ Mixed 663 497% 665 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 372%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 445GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 214 410 420 414 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	75% Very good	Read 481 Write 408 Mixed 373 SusWrite 260 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 20.9 104% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 1 58% 136 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G26C16S4B.16FD 2x16GB 659 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 25.2 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 23.9 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	144	23.8"	1280 720	ACR0526 XB241YU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,031x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	448x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	275x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	275x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	159x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	115x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	772x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16