Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230506
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 17:17
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 194
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 407
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tecmiyo M.2 2280 SSD 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 307 302 330 358 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 474
Write 417
Mixed 387
SusWrite 300
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 12.8
117% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 16.9
65% 143 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
434GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 83 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 88.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 82.2
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Datotek AITC AID48G26C19UBD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 28.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback