Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230927
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '24 at 11:32
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$147 9,841 User benchmarks, average bench 93% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 71.8 1-Core 147 2-Core 280 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 832 82% 669 Pts	64-Core 971 60% 971 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 88.5 54% 72.7 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 75 Splatting 47.4 49% 62 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,307 Write 1,006 Mixed 987 244% 1,100 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 62.2 200% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 1,006 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 1,036 757% 987 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 38GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 481 120 57 49 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 473 Mixed 385 SusWrite 207 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 46.7 151% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 263 227% 335 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB 43,162 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 26.4 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 21.4 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	10%	31	209	57	60	27"	1280 720	ACR079F QG271

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B550 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	480x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	448x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	240x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	198x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	160x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	142x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	93x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	52x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	50x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	77x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	77x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $625

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16