Lenovo 11BM001XFR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 11BM001XFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3178
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 08:50
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$145
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 481
65% 483 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Legend(17AA 3178) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,223
Write 2,076
Mixed 1,178
405% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 61.3
198% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 811
613% 819 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 22.5" 1280 720 IVM5639 PL2395W
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback