TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 23:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 451
44% 363 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 65.7%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1265) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5186
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 32.1
26% 34.5 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 20.6
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 25.4%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Consistent M.2 S6 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1220B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 51 8.5 76 16 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 472
Write 422
Mixed 227
SusWrite 47.6
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 13.1
24% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 35.7%
 Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
230GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 136 133 131 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 94.5
Write 146
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 132
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 65.1%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 32.1%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05D8
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples3,753x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,738x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples2,915x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,513x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples687x
SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples833x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples256x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples197x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples603x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples413x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples279x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback