Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 20:07
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 237
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 710
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
EVGA(3842 4877) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 259
Parallax 293
236% 281 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 239
Splatting 179
202% 258 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 200%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 1TB
577GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 384 396 400 395 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 499
Write 460
Mixed 364
SusWrite 394
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 32.4
108% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 183
149% 217 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 120%
WDC WD4005FZBX-0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 213 214 214 215 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.1% Poor
Read 214
Write 214
Mixed 115
SusWrite 215
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.6
11% 4.57 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 5.2
4% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 65%
WDC WD4005FZBX-0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 213 206 210 213 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.5% Poor
Read 165
Write 172
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 209
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.4
10% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 5.6
DQ Mixed 6.8
5% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 65%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 139 141 141 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 118
Mixed 97
SusWrite 140
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 98%
WD WD8002FZWX-00BKUA0 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 203 203 204 202 201 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 34.7
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 21 60 27" 1280 720 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback