HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8308
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '24 at 19:25
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 654 69% 551 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.6% Very good	Lighting 96.4 Reflection 110 Parallax 99.2 79% 102 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 95 Splatting 97.3 79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 193 146 158 164 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1,277 Write 754 Mixed 553 SusWrite 173 152% 689 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 55.7 186% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 798 DQ Write 579 DQ Mixed 676 509% 684 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 405GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 153 165 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 158 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 162 97% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 22 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 22.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	165	24"	1280 720	AUS24AC VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	512x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	220x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	324x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	231x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	141x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	86x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	70x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	202x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	135x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16