Thirdwave XT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThirdwave XT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H370-A
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 15:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 792
80% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.8% Very good
Lighting 93.9
Reflection 93.8
Parallax 86.2
76% 91.3 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 73.4
69% 85.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 292 309 252 321 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 344
Mixed 290
SusWrite 309
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 39.6
136% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 205
189% 292 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
563GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 162 167 168 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 148
Write 154
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 165
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 LEN61C6 LEN T27i-10
Typical XT Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Thirdwave XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback