Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 352%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive475% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 11:54
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 211
2-Core 422
126% 241 Pts
4-Core 840
8-Core 1,680
149% 1,260 Pts
64-Core 2,959
183% 2,959 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 124%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
EVGA(3842 4985) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Lighting 375
Reflection 324
Parallax 408
306% 369 fps
MRender 399
Gravity 316
Splatting 209
241% 308 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 247%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM800PRO 2TB
987GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.7.F.V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3209 3807 3805 3917 3926 3906 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 2,361
Write 4,410
Mixed 2,853
SusWrite 3,762
762% 3,346 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77.7
258% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,822
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,622
1,209% 1,613 MB/s
Poor: 248%
This bench: 475%
Great: 614%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
863GB free
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 822 768 773 772 769 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,387
Write 1,564
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 787
338% 1,520 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.4
208% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 265
237% 374 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 227%
Great: 372%
Spcc 2.5 SSD 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: S1224A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 334 331 333 332 332 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 482
Write 463
Mixed 361
SusWrite 331
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 30.1
130% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 48.3
90% 170 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 89%
Great: 99%
SSD 4TB 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VE1R9002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 395 398 398 396 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 385
Write 392
Mixed 354
SusWrite 397
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 31.6
114% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 176
137% 182 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83%
Great: 215%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 458 459 460 458 459 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 458
Mixed 397
SusWrite 460
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 23.2
125% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 33.8
90% 185 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 112%
Pcie SSD 1TB
440GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3291 3331 3334 2847 1385 851 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 3367
Mixed 2,260
SusWrite 2,506
580% 2558 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 70.4
227% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 2,063
DQ Write 1,586
DQ Mixed 1,907
1,404% 1,852 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 389%
Great: 438%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
867GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 70 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 88.2
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 70.7
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 103 97 94 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 114
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 99.6
63% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.8
384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 97 101 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 62.1
Write 82.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 99.7
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 177 175 177 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 140
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 175
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 72.7
MC Write 72.5
MC Mixed 72.5
207% 72.6 GB/s
SC Read 57.5
SC Write 78.8
SC Mixed 64
191% 66.8 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 200%
Great: 304%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DC5 MSI G321CU
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback