HP 550-227c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP 550-227c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 04:48
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8850 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 114
48% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 189
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Asus(1043 8976) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.32
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 70.5
61% 72.7 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 57.5
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 341 354 377 375 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 435
Write 323
Mixed 337
SusWrite 351
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 30.2
105% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 219
170% 233 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 137%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
2TB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 127 130 127 132 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 116
Write 134
Mixed 20
SusWrite 127
132% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYEA01 SONY TV
Typical 550-227c Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-227c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback