Asrock Z590-C/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z590-C/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 01:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 296
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 884
92% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 309
Reflection 294
Parallax 321
252% 308 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 250
Splatting 181
204% 261 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,014
Write 1,992
Mixed 1,734
427% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.5
212% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,235
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 1,056
793% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
12GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 6
Mixed 14
16% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.2
166% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake Co Ltd R009D408GX2-3600C18B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 29.7
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 30
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 160 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B9A 27GN950
Typical Z590-C/ac Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590-C/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback