Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190306
Uptime12 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 01:57
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 121
2-Core 225
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 473
53% 418 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Acer(1025 1332) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 38.6
29% 37.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 25.9
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 343 341 338 338 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,018
Write 338
Mixed 438
SusWrite 347
118% 535 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 38.1
142% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 419
325% 447 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 126%
Great: 153%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
975GB free
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1281 1708 744 750 780 791 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,344
Write 1,728
Mixed 1,575
SusWrite 1,009
320% 1,414 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 53.6
175% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 572
441% 608 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 198%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 189 8 60 24.5" 1920 1009 SPT6437 Sceptre M25
Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback