PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18E4 |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190417 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '24 at 01:27 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 82 80 82 MB/s
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
5GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7 6.9 7 6.7 13 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
145GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.1 7.1 7.2 7 7 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
5GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 7 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6.9 6.8 7.1 7.2 7.1 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 0.7" | 1280 720 | CKL0001 Matrix Switch |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 840x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 762x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 750x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1,198x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 367x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 246x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $231 |