Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	44.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180712
Uptime	13.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '24 at 21:40
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 772 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 158 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 619 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 2,366 146% 2,366 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 49.7 32% 41.3 fps	MRender 50.8 Gravity 48 Splatting 38 36% 45.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 136 122 130 122 112 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 217 Write 155 Mixed 156 SusWrite 128 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 18.4 64% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 63.1 57% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 199 197 199 199 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 150 Mixed 71.6 SusWrite 199 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.9% Very good	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 29.8 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.7 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27A3 ASUS PB278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16