Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-D8-MAX
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1862 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 20:32
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 150
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 723
63% 536 Pts
64-Core 3,246
201% 3,246 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 118
Parallax 120
103% 121 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 103
Splatting 87.3
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101Q 512GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0814A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 22 24 18 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.4% Very poor
Read 269
Write 27.9
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 21.4
19% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 3
18% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 38.8
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 34.8" 1280 720 ELE0000 ELEFW328B
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback