Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '24 at 20:24
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265 6,606 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 23.3 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 64.1 23% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 71.1 8-Core 86 10% 78.6 Pts	64-Core 65.8 4% 65.8 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B 3454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.2% Poor	Lighting 32.4 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 37.1 26% 38.4 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 25.1 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT02L5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 149 132 155 140 176 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.8% Below average	Read 260 Write 111 Mixed 112 SusWrite 146 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 11.7 42% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 56.2 66% 116 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 756GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 116 120 113 131 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 78.3 Write 157 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 119 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 45: 0P 5R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	23%	66	90	9	60	20"	1600 900	ACI20A7 ASUSMS208

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	13x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	12x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	5x

SSD
SQ500S37480G 480GBKingstonBench 77%, 1,176 samples	3x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	3x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	2x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16