TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 85.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 265
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 939
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 90.1%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 48.9
46% 61.4 fps
MRender 43.9
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 44.7
38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 43.4%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 100 83 75 58 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1212
Write 883
Mixed 798
SusWrite 107
166% 750 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 48.4
168% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 219
246% 407 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 129%
 Great: 203%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
347GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 168 165 167 165 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 189
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 163
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X KHX2666C16D4/16GX 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 70%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 31% 13 215 57 75 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3545 HP 24f
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples2,407x
Core i7-9700Intel  $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples2,037x
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples720x
GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia  $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples1,343x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples838x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples720x
SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples1,413x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples1,238x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples301x
RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples1,915x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples784x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples456x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback