Lenovo 42912WG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 30% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 42912WG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42912WG
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '18 at 21:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 33.6
27% 36.7 Pts
4-Core 51.4
8-Core 51.9
7% 51.7 Pts
64-Core 53.2
3% 53.2 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.81
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0004LVM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 98.4
Mixed 89.5
73% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.41
86% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 42912WG Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 42912WG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback