MSI B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D20
MotherboardMSI B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 02:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 945
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 17.4
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 15.7
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nx-512 2280 512GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1.A.1S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1878 2198 2112 2274 672 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,391
Write 1867
Mixed 1,334
SusWrite 1,582
350% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 56.4
229% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 200
333% 653 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 261%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB/16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 5R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 40% 48 217 59 60 26.9" 1280 720 DELF017 DELL U2410
Typical B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20) Builds (Compare 3,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B560M-A PRO (MS-7D20)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback