Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 02:21
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 176
2-Core 350
107% 203 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,339
119% 1,009 Pts
64-Core 2,725
169% 2,725 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4042) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 288
Parallax 320
135% 258 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 248
Splatting 184
203% 258 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 147%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 233 291 493 545 500 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 259
Write 2,232
Mixed 464
SusWrite 518
200% 868 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 43.1
135% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 1246
DQ Mixed 580
595% 959 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 135%
Great: 500%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
260GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1585 1353 1304 1444 1357 1000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 270
Write 1,690
Mixed 450
SusWrite 1,340
216% 938 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 49.1
158% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 1,511
DQ Mixed 1,214
942% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 200%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2Z4000C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 44.9
146% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 42.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 134%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 144 27" 1280 720 AUS27B6 ROG PG278QE
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback