Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 01:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 125
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 454
38% 329 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gigabyte(1458 3527) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 16.8
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 18
Splatting 16.5
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0805A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 23 87 48 29 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 474
Write 385
Mixed 287
SusWrite 91.5
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 22.7
98% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 41.2
68% 128 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL BLS4G3D18ADS3J.8FE F3-14900CL9-4GBXL BLS4G3D18ADS3J.8FE 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA08E Panasonic-TV
Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $626
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback