HP Slim Desktop S01-pF2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Slim Desktop S01-pF2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89B4
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231108
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 13:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$136
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 182
2-Core 322
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,002
99% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,231
76% 1,231 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
HP(103C 89B4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 8.6
6% 9.9 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.4
5% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G-1006 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 1801 1530 344 332 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 3,305
Write 1,879
Mixed 1,700
SusWrite 955
434% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 67.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 75.2
260% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 864
683% 944 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 314%
Great: 309%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNUA076N 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 25% 4 104 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2270 2270W
Typical Slim Desktop S01-pF2xxx Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop S01-pF2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback