Asus UX310UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAsus UX310UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX310UA
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 13:39
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 129
47% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1280) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.27 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.4
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hgst HTS541010A7E630 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 5.2 8.8 12 6 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 916
Write 12
Mixed 21
SusWrite 7.8
50% 239 MB/s
4K Read 102
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.7
158% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.6
20% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 9 60 13.2" 1280 720 AUO272D
Typical UX310UA Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX310UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback