Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 309%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive497% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GX650PY
Memory50.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 734 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 10:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 204
2-Core 411
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,571
141% 1,188 Pts
64-Core 3,514
218% 3,514 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 114%
Great: 117%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Asus(1043 1433) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.38.08
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 13.8
6% 12.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 22.4
13% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 8%
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1433) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 4550 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 366
Parallax 342
244% 336 fps
MRender 441
Gravity 262
Splatting 224
243% 309 fps
Poor: 142%
This bench: 215%
Great: 244%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3483 3640 3371 2413 3182 3349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
497% Outstanding
Read 4,607
Write 3,184
Mixed 2,484
SusWrite 3,240
755% 3,379 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 76.6
254% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,041
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 1,132
755% 915 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 497%
Great: 495%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBSA095N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 47.2
151% 52.9 GB/s
SC Read 48.6
SC Write 57.8
SC Mixed 47.7
147% 51.4 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 147%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 14.1" 1707 996 BOE0A68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback