Intel X99-P3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P3  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231121
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 07:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 639
57% 480 Pts
64-Core 1,337
83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 139 17 7.9 28 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 249
Write 215
Mixed 201
SusWrite 50.5
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 20.2
89% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 126
109% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
Xraydisk 1TB SSD 1TB
395GB free
Firmware: VC2S038E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 1310 1351 1270 108 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,729
Write 1,348
Mixed 1,132
SusWrite 882
284% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 46.7
151% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 406
304% 407 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 188%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 38% 16 193 31 180 0" 1280 720
Typical X99-P3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback