Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful BATTLE-AX A520M-M.2 PRO
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 01:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 661
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3090 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 96.2
Parallax 61
58% 76.1 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 63.8
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 1TB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 1011 397 1106 126 588 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,555
Mixed 981
SusWrite 632
256% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 25.9
200% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 488
472% 744 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 190%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAPC08G2666D4T8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 29.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 28.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 144 27" 1920 1017 MSI1462 Optix MAG27C
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback