HP ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 872E
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 21:46
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 52.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 273
79% 153 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 791
83% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 872E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.30.01
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 25.6
15% 20.4 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 20.5
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 903 883 438 94 123 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 781
Write 770
Mixed 698
SusWrite 434
151% 671 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 50
169% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 809
DQ Mixed 348
329% 496 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 135%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD8266.C16FJ Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 19.5" 1280 720 GSM5B20 LG IPS WSXGA
Typical ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP ProDesk 405 G6 Desktop Mini PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback