Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 19:59
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$365
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 220
2-Core 434
128% 247 Pts
4-Core 840
8-Core 1,665
148% 1,253 Pts
64-Core 2,924
181% 2,924 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255
Gigabyte(1458 4071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
106% 125 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 105
Splatting 89
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 357 247 214 204 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 511
Write 440
Mixed 345
SusWrite 268
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 35.5
118% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 207
176% 257 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
350GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,025
Write 11,541
Mixed 9,230
2,160% 9,598 MB/s
4K Read 703
4K Write 432
4K Mixed 346
1,738% 494 MB/s
DQ Read 1,744
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,309
1,013% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
536GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 486 485 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 488
Mixed 412
SusWrite 487
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 40.3
134% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
298GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 102
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
833GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 82 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 93.4
Write 91.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 80.9
99% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 79.7
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 66.5
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 54.2
SC Write 64.8
SC Mixed 61
171% 60 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 192%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 417%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback