Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 16:18
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 183
60% 111 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 432
37% 316 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Asus(1043 1091) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.20.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 17.4
0% 9.07 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 10
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 81 96 99 84 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 110
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 90
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback