Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime20.7 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 13:18
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 913
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,293
80% 1,293 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 258
Parallax 299
244% 286 fps
MRender 327
Gravity 241
Splatting 173
194% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 202%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 285 519 100 4.5 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,779
Write 2,169
Mixed 1,910
SusWrite 185
340% 1,511 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 81.7
263% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,119
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 1,097
794% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 209%
Great: 573%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: RKT40Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 2.7 10 57 61 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
561% Outstanding
Read 7,210
Write 61.2
Mixed 121
SusWrite 23.6
385% 1,854 MB/s
4K Read 669
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 7.4
1,025% 227 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 561%
Great: 331%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: VE0R6364
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 349 333 330 336 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 340
Write 336
Mixed 300
SusWrite 330
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 30.2
97% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 202
142% 176 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 117%
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G2B0A- 500GB
313GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 39 4.4 0.6 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 173%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
145GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.3 8.5 3 4.7 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
383GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 152 153 35 3.8 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 142
Write 113
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 99.5
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 38.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 35.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback