Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 362%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 485%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics339% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 12:23
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 195
2-Core 389
114% 220 Pts
4-Core 776
8-Core 1,555
138% 1,166 Pts
64-Core 3,698
229% 3,698 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Gigabyte(1458 40E4) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte AERO OC
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
339% Outstanding
Lighting 518
Reflection 565
Parallax 742
422% 608 fps
MRender 503
Gravity 547
Splatting 296
352% 449 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 339%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2680 2529 1681 1706 1717 1710 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 2,921
Write 3390
Mixed 3,085
SusWrite 2,004
643% 2,850 MB/s
4K Read 76.8
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 113
376% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,706
DQ Write 1,420
DQ Mixed 1563
1,171% 1,563 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 426%
Great: 508%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
244GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 472 473 445 422 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 468
Mixed 424
SusWrite 451
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 57.7
193% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 301
247% 351 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Lexar NM710 2TB
872GB free
Firmware: 9742
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3672 3938 3926 3881 3892 3735 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
535% Outstanding
Read 4,088
Write 325
Mixed 562
SusWrite 3,841
486% 2,204 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.7
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,787
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 393
450% 815 MB/s
Poor: 262%
This bench: 535%
Great: 570%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
212GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 302 302 302 301 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 489
Mixed 409
SusWrite 321
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 64.1
221% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4229 4286 4088 4410 4140 2578 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
576% Outstanding
Read 3,080
Write 4,668
Mixed 3,263
SusWrite 3,955
849% 3,742 MB/s
4K Read 81.1
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 120
400% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 2,101
DQ Write 1,799
DQ Mixed 1,906
1,440% 1,935 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 576%
Great: 592%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
722GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 113 113 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 93.3
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 111
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 54.4
MC Mixed 52.3
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 49.9
SC Write 61
SC Mixed 49.3
153% 53.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 154%
Great: 190%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 9G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 31.5" 3072 1705 SAM7256 Odyssey G8
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback