Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLAJ 001
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 07:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 282
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 742
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1362) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5186
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.5% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 74.8
68% 78.5 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 59.2
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 425
Mixed 398
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 18.9
86% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
20% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback