Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory118.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 23:00
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 209
2-Core 412
122% 235 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,506
139% 1,164 Pts
64-Core 2,916
180% 2,916 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
EVGA(3842 4985) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 551.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 380
Parallax 281
97% 260 fps
MRender 362
Gravity 302
Splatting 200
226% 288 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 133%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1614 1368 1316 1383 1368 1346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,691
Write 2,410
Mixed 1,811
SusWrite 1,399
465% 2,078 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 107
356% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1195
897% 1,203 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 358%
Great: 421%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
725GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 468 467 468 466 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 441
Mixed 436
SusWrite 463
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40.8
154% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%
Intel Optane H10 with SSD 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 19.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 1110 1096 1102 1121 1115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3165 3315 3179 1759 1268 1258 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
409% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 3,444
Mixed 3,017
SusWrite 2324
640% 2,824 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 111
341% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,168
DQ Mixed 1,305
981% 1,316 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 409%
Great: 489%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
11TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 237 233 233 229 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 105%
WD Game Drive 5TB
3TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 106 107 105 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 84.2
Write 98.6
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 101
122% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-32GTRS 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 34
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 31
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 101%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAME028 Odyssey G95SC
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback