Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 12:49
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 184
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 70.1
39% 59.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 43.8
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 122 123 131 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 212
Write 132
Mixed 116
SusWrite 123
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 20
84% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 90
21% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
130GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 138 145 135 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 51.2
Write 89
Mixed 60
SusWrite 135
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
161GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 200
Write 12
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 16.6
44% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 70 64GB
48GB free, PID 172b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.3 7.4 6.3 8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 56.8
Write 7.7
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 7.1
22% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
46% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1333D364L9/4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback