Acer Aspire ES1-331

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-331  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ES1-331
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 05:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3710
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Memory 30
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 47
21% 33.5 Pts
4-Core 87.7
8-Core 88.2
12% 87.9 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 1018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 2.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 393 376 369 381 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 448
Write 402
Mixed 364
SusWrite 380
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 27
85% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 124
95% 129 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6AFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 27 60 13.2" 1280 720 AUO162C
Typical Aspire ES1-331 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-331

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback