Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 21:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 127
2-Core 271
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,043
94% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 173
Parallax 165
146% 172 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 15 13 14 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 517
Write 39.4
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 15.2
31% 149 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 23.2
79% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
353GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1245 539 552 572 564 568 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 2,040
Mixed 1,828
SusWrite 673
367% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 74.9
261% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,633
DQ Write 1,244
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,038% 1,412 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 266%
Great: 300%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
457GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 114 115 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 147
Mixed 104
SusWrite 114
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2356WS.001 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 144 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F91 LC24RG50
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $432
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback