Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 16:53
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 991
92% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,451
90% 1,451 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 136
Parallax 294
114% 190 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 150
Splatting 205
163% 200 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 125%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XF-512 500GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0629479F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2303 2326 1992 1083 284 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,477
Write 2,322
Mixed 1785
SusWrite 1,377
446% 1,990 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 74
250% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 1,130
797% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 302%
Great: 342%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
66GB free
Firmware: 520ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 124 124 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 329
Write 81.8
Mixed 176
SusWrite 123
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 39.5
146% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 125
100% 141 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 483 487 487 435 339 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 489
Mixed 434
SusWrite 452
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48.8
172% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 376
283% 378 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST2000DX002 2TB
555GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 186 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 158
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 184
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
380GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 104 104 101 76 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 141
Write 109
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 96.8
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 Adata DDR4 3600 Adata DDR4 3600 Adata DDR4 3600 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.8
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 37.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 144 27" 2560 1369 GBT2709 G27Q
Typical GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2 Builds (Compare 6,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback