Lenovo 83A2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83A2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240222
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 04:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 175
2-Core 340
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 827
85% 686 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 17.5
12% 17.7 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 15.4
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1778 1850 1704 1248 2008 2011 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,158
Write 816
Mixed 1,684
SusWrite 1,766
359% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 74.4
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 99.1
352% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,686
DQ Write 1,262
DQ Mixed 1118
932% 1,355 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 368%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MF96HAF-3200 Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 29
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 23.8
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE09C1
Typical 83A2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback