PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.2 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100528 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 21 '24 at 00:21 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3470
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 92 82 82 74 79 MB/s
|
26%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
232GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 94 82 82 74 80 MB/s
|
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 56 | 85 | 34.1" | 1280 720 | ACR06F3 XV340CK P |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 53x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 53x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 22x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $128 |